Jump to content

David Yanke

Members
  • Content Count

    182
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Seller statistics

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

David Yanke last won the day on June 21 2018

David Yanke had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

339 Excellent

2 Followers

About David Yanke

  • Rank
    Pupa

Converted

  • Beekeeping Experience
    Bee Breeder

Location

  • Location
    Far North

Recent Profile Visitors

1289 profile views
  1. I was only sounding a note of caution. I think you have done a great job further developing this new delivery system for OA which appears to be a cheap, effective varroa management tool, and as you say this system could be used to deliver other Varroa Killers. Good on ya. I certainly wasn't trying to stop people using it to manage varroa, just flashing a warning about using it exclusively. For decades OA has been used to managed Varroa with no solid evidence of mite resistance, but, until recently, it was always used in a Shock and Awe treatment of Broodless Colonies(either natural or induced broodlessness) with an OA syrup dribble or spray with treatment being repeated twice at the most because of the toxicity to Bees, and then no more OA until the same time next season. Now what you are doing is totally different, and the risk of mite resistance is very much higher.
  2. I guess with your dismissal of 'synthetics', you are including amitraz strips as well. I haven't been following this forum much lately, but in a quick glance now, everyone seems 'staple' obsessed. I just want to voice some caution. This is a relatively new way of administering OA. It seems to rely on almost constant treatment. While to date there is no known evidence of mite resistance to OA, that will change. Beekeepers cling to the hope that because the mechanism of toxicity to mites of OA is different to the 'synthetics' then somehow this will protect us from mite resistance. It won't, constant exposure will just see mites find a different pathway to resistance. It is just as stupid to constantly treat with OA, as it is to constantly treat with fluvalinate, flumethrin, or amitraz. Remember as well, OA is toxic to both bees and mites, just more toxic to mites, there is not a lot of margin there- don't treat it like it is a Bee Vitamin. As well, best case, no resistance, you 'Staple' guys seem to spend most of your time with the nuisance of a brood nest full of staples(damaging a lot of brood comb), and constantly monitoring mite levels, doesn't sound like enjoyable beekeeping to me. Having all your eggs in one basket is never a good idea.
  3. That would be more likely labelled MGO 40, very low quality "Manuka", shouldn't be allowed to be labelled Manuka, would be NPA(UMF) about 2 plus. Genuine UMF 40 plus would be priceless!
  4. @Philbee The Staples can't take all the credit- there is a LOT of Carnica in those mongrels of yours!!
  5. So sorry, what I meant was that you looked older and wiser than expected- or is that just digging a deeper hole for myself!
  6. I don't understand the mechanism, but I think it is almost certain that some high C4 sugar results in Manuka have little to do with sugar syrup feeding, and most high C4 for sugar results in Kanuka have little to do with feeding sugar syrup. For us in the Far North Kanuka is a second, totally separate crop. Manuka boxes come off, and the Kanuka boxes go on, yet some years, like this year, when we had an amazing Kanuka flow in our area, and ended up with a very big crop, of very pure Kanuka- had a 3-PLA level of 3100mg/kg(3-PLA is an amazing Kanuka marker making it worse than useless as a Manuka Marker IMHO), yet, virtually everyone had highish C4 sugar results, and it is almost impossible for those results to have had anything to do with sugar syrup feeding.
  7. Not sure where Gino worked, but I think in most places, best commercial practice is to dust across the top bars with an icing sugar/oxytetracycline(OTC) mix every time you go into the hive before the honey boxes go on, and then for good measure, some still use extender patties, which are a vegetable shortening, sugar and OTC delight that is thought to give you antibiotic cover during the honey flow. The problem, with only treating in the spring, is that the colonies break down with AFB during the honey flow once the levels of OTC fall below levels which inhibit AFB infection, and whole lot of AFB scale is produced which creates the AFB problem you'll face and treat for next season. That is the slippery slope you fall down, once you start trying to control AFB with antibiotics. This is an ailing industry. It might not be obvious to honey marketers, but it is painfully obvious to beekeepers. We did enjoy booming growth, and now we are experiencing the beginnings of a very unenjoyable bust. The reason is because that growth was rampant and uncontrolled. The industry was overwhelmed with a 'gold fever', and in our madness, colony numbers grew far beyond what was sustainable, beekeeper behaviour degraded to the point where the 'wild west' analogies were totally accurate, and all of us should have been totally embarrassed by our behaviours when it came to the ruthless way we hunted down sites- we could only sleep at night because we told ourselves that others have done the same to us, so we can do it to them. The industry isn't in it's death throws, it will survive, but a lot of beekeepers won't.
  8. It is a madness- that is almost twice as many colonies as there are in Australia, and 200,000 more colonies then there are in all of Canada!
  9. We all knew things were unsustainable, and we all knew that the crazy, unregulated, rampant increase in hive numbers was leading us to disaster, but the speed and severity of the downfall is eye-watering! Day by day it feels more and more apocalyptic.
  10. Any word back from MPI on those results???
  11. Fake News. That beast did not die from drinking water contaminated by a 1080 drop. Thousands of water samples have been taken following 1080 drops, only a very tiny fraction even test positive for 1080, and the testing thresh hold is as low as .1 part per billion(ppb). Even a smaller number have ever been above the allowable limit for drinking water of 2ppb even when taken from streams in the drop zone. At 2ppm a human would have to drink 60,000 litres of that water to get a lethal dose. No beast, no bird, no bee, no person has been harmed by drinking water following a 1080 drop. Only eating the bait can deliver a lethal dose.
  12. Anti-1080ers, like Antivaxxers, Flat Earthers and every other conspiracy enthusiast have never let facts get in the way of a good story.
  13. If all the bees were as healthy looking as the one pictured, except for the K-wing, then I am still betting it isn't CBPV. If there was heavy virus loading, then most of the bee would bee looking slick, and hairless, besides trembling. The bee pictured was literally a picture of health, with very healthy pubescence, but testing will tell. Good on you for acting so quickly on this.
  14. I don't think a virus is responsible for what we are seeing here. It could be an insecticide that caused the wings to unhinge, or something worse. The more I think about this the more worried I get. Call the MPI Hotline if you want some action straight away over the weekend. Let's hope they have been just exposed to an insecticide.
×
×
  • Create New...