Jump to content

Dangerous bee virus might be innocent bystander


Recommended Posts

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/01/190129195223.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Fplants_animals%2Fviruses+(Virology+News+--+ScienceDaily)

 

The scientific paper on which this article was based is available at:

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2018.2452

Abstract

The arrival of the ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor on the western honeybee Apis mellifera saw a change in the diversity and prevalence of honeybee RNA viruses. One virus in particular, deformed wing virus (DWV) has become closely associated with V. destructor, leading many to conclude that V. destructor has affected viral virulence by changing the mode of transmission. While DWV is normally transmitted via feeding and faeces, V. destructor transmits viruses by direct injection. This change could have resulted in higher viral prevalence causing increased damage to the bees. Here we test the effect of a change in the mode of transmission on the composition and levels of honeybee RNA viruses in the absence of V. destructor. We find a rapid increase in levels of two viruses, sacbrood virus (SBV) and black queen cell virus (BQCV) after direct injection of viral extracts into honeybee pupae. In pupae injected with high levels of DWV extracted from symptomatic adult bees, DWV levels rapidly decline in the presence of SBV and BQCV. Further, we observe high mortality in honeybee pupae when injected with SBV and BQCV, whereas injecting pupae with high levels of DWV results in near 100% survival. Our results suggest a different explanation for the observed association between V. destructor and DWV. Instead of V. destructor causing an increase in DWV virulence, we hypothesize that direct virus inoculation, such as that mediated by a vector, quickly eliminates the most virulent honeybee viruses resulting in an association with less virulent viruses such as DWV.

  • Good Info 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I haven't had complete read of this paper yet but what they suggest (hypothesise) is that DWV is actually a far less virulent virus than some of the other viruses, which are apparently eliminated due

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/01/190129195223.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Fplants_animals%2Fviruses+(Virology+News+--+Sci

Sorry, meant ‘especially as *DWv” is indeed reported to replicate in varroa’

Its an interesting read - and I need to read it again.

One of the issues I have . . we frequently (bordering on always) find high levels of BQCV in bee samples. . .  its the DWV levels that vary. Perhaps it is a synergistic effect.

Also, the DWV samples they used were from New Zealand (Aussie paper). As they admit, they do not have varroa and thus are they testing the correct strains (ie they haven't been 'selected' by Australian varroa.

I agree with you @Otto - especially as varroa is indeed reported to replicate in varroa (as well as in the chalkbrood fungus)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...