Jump to content
jamesc

Chasing the gold

Recommended Posts

Yep Genetic and animal health is key.  You would probably find the difference between the stars and the dubs are more animal health than genetic in bees. Bees have to be healthy to reach there potential. 

Edited by flash4cash
  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good observations James.

I have also seen folk sell their weaner calves and lambs and not understand why they did not get the top price.

Genetics and taking care to ensure that you  breed the best is the secret.

And has been the reason for successful farmers for many years now.

I am certain it will work for beekeepers, we just need to do the work and record the results.

Take a look at the work of Sheep Improvement Limited (SIL). https://www.sil.co.nz/

 I quote from their website; " It is part of Beef + Lamb New Zealand (B+LNZ) Genetics – a wholly-owned subsidiary of B+LNZ.

It is therefore owned by New Zealand farmers, being funded by sheep meat levies and fees charged to breeders.

SIL provides tools and information for ram breeders and commercial farmers – with the goal of improving the profitability

of sheep farming in New Zealand." 

What we need to see is an industry funded model like this for our Queen breeders, so their customers know what they are purchasing.

A beekeeper needs to know they are getting the best value bred bees for their business.

This is why I support the Api NZ Levy as 40% of the money is for research.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

40% of the levy for research is no where near enough, that is why I will vote NO for the current levy proposal.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is never ending story.. To enhance a chance of positive results, I think should include also drone selection ( drone mother/s)..

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, olbe said:

40% of the levy for research is no where near enough, that is why I will vote NO for the current levy proposal.

 

 

Olbe, you are forgetting that research is a broad category, any research for Bio-security can come out of the bio-security portion etc, and these are staring points, the levy payers are the main ones to decide from the members where and when. So you would rather vote no and have no money spent on research as it is now rather than starting to get some money spent on the things we want as a starting point and build from there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NZ Beekeeping Inc are already funding some research from subscriptions etc - but then, they are not funding an ever growing corporate structure, and they get to choose which ones and how much, all beekeepers, no hangers on making the decisions.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Sailabee said:

 all beekeepers, no hangers on making the decisions.

 

And that for me is the crux of the matter,

I was a staunch supporter of the NBA there are many posts on this forum where I tried  to promote them.

when it changed to Apinz and membership was open to corporates, landowners packers etc I felt it had moved away from its core business of looking out for the guys out there doing the hard yards.

whether this is real or perceived it’s how I feel 

  • Agree 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...